This Week in Forensic Science

No one has hours to scour the papers to keep up with the latest news, so we’ve curated the top news stories in the field of Forensic Science for this week. Here’s what you need to know to get out the door! Placer County Sheriff’s Department Leverages Othram’s Identity Inference Platform to Identify a 1994 John […]

Meet Your ISHI 37 Speakers: Ronaldo Carneiro da Silva Junior

196 member countries. One shared DNA infrastructure. Most working analysts have never touched it. INTERPOL runs two separate systems. One does what a national database already does: compares one profile to another. The other, I-Familia, runs kinship algorithms to compare a sample against relatives, built specifically for the unidentified remains and missing persons cases a […]

This Week in Forensic Science

No one has hours to scour the papers to keep up with the latest news, so we’ve curated the top news stories in the field of Forensic Science for this week. Here’s what you need to know to get out the door! Lydia de Castro ’91, ’10: Using Forensic Science to Identify 9/11 Victims (John Jay […]

What They’re Looking Forward to at ISHI 37: A Conversation with the ISHI Advisory Committee

The people who help shape ISHI’s agenda have a front-row view of where forensic science is heading. So, what are they actually looking forward to? https://youtu.be/RQDgMbFY0Wk Three of the four ISHI Advisory Committee members are watching artificial intelligence — but for very different reasons. Shena Latcham is thinking about cold cases — specifically, the friction […]

It Takes a Village: The August 2026 ISHI Report is Now Available

August tends to arrive in forensic science labs with a kind of dual energy, one foot still in summer’s casework, the other already leaning toward Providence. ISHI 37 is just a few months out, and the August issue of The ISHI Report arrives in that window, a preview of some of the stories and conversations […]

Meet Your ISHI 37 Speakers: Mark Perlin

A state crime lab ran DNA from a gun and got an inconclusive result: multiple contributors, no clean match. Probabilistic genotyping software reran the same evidence and returned a likelihood ratio of 11.5 trillion to one. That gap, an inconclusive read against a number that precise, is exactly what got challenged on appeal. The Third […]